🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 814+ reviews
Vintage āœ“ In Stock šŸ”„ Bestseller

Vintage gold filled Sweet Heart Locket!

ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜… 4.2 out of 5 (814 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$28​
$46.67
Sale
āœ“ at no charge shipment on this item • Limited time offer

Pretty Vintage Gold Filled Sweet Heart Locket!

šŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid fulfillment

ā†©ļø
practical Returns

šŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage gold filled Sweet Heart Locket!

Pretty Vintage Gold Filled Sweet Heart Locket!​

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

šŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 369998

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Pendants

Original Price: $46.67 USD

Sale Price: $28 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 dispatch & Returns

āœ“ complimentary shipment on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Based on 814 reviews
TM
Tyler Mitchell āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
faultless for Vintage gold filled Sweet Heart Locket!
At first, the Vintage gold filled Sweet Heart Locket! works fine and it works for me.
MK
Megan King āœ“ Verified
4 weeks ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Highly endorse Vintage gold filled Sweet Heart Locket!
The Vintage gold filled Sweet Heart Locket! is elementary and uncomplicated to use.
TT
Thomas Taylor āœ“ Verified
4 weeks ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
adore this Vintage gold filled Sweet Heart Locket!!
After certain use, the Vintage gold filled Sweet Heart Locket! feels solid which is good enough. Works fine so far.
WG
William Garcia āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
adore this Vintage gold filled Sweet Heart Locket!!
So far, the Vintage gold filled Sweet Heart Locket! works well enough which feels reasonable.
KG
Kevin Green āœ“ Verified
3 weeks ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Five Stars for Vintage gold filled Sweet Heart Locket!​
To be fair, the Vintage gold filled Sweet Heart Locket! is functional to use so I’m okay with it.